Need Immediate Legal Assistance? Our Experts Are Just a Call Away! | Request a Callback

What Is A Notice of Intended Prosecution?

Contents

Key Takeaways

  • A Notice of Intended Prosecution (NIP) is a warning, not a conviction. It informs you that the police may prosecute you for certain motoring offences, including speeding, dangerous or careless driving, traffic signal offences and failing to stop or report an accident.
  • The police will generally need to issue an NIP within 14 days. This can be satisfied by a verbal warning at the roadside or a written notice sent to the registered keeper. There are exceptions, particularly where the vehicle is leased, hired or company-owned.
  • An NIP and Section 172 notice are different. The NIP warns of potential prosecution, while the Section 172 notice requires the recipient to identify who was driving. Failing to provide driver details within 28 days can result in a separate offence carrying 6 penalty points and a fine.
  • Receiving an NIP does not necessarily mean you’ll go to court. Depending on the circumstances and your driving record, the police may offer a fixed penalty, a driver awareness course or proceed with a prosecution. An NIP can also potentially be challenged in certain circumstances, including where the 14-day requirement has not been met and no exception applies.
  • Acting promptly is important. Check the dates and details on the notice, respond to any Section 172 request within the deadline and preserve relevant evidence such as dashcam footage, photographs and witness details. If you’re unsure whether to accept the allegation or challenge it, obtaining legal advice before responding can help protect your position.

A notice of intended prosecution, usually shortened to NIP, is a formal letter from the police warning you that you may be prosecuted for a motoring offence. Receiving one can be alarming, but it isn’t a conviction or even a formal charge. It’s simply the first step in a process that gives you a chance to respond before any decision is made.

In this guide, our driving offence solicitors explain what a notice of intended prosecution actually means, when the police have to send one, and what you need to do once it lands on your doormat.

Why Are Notices of Intended Prosecution Sent?

The legal basis for a notice of intended prosecution comes from section 1 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988. For certain offences, the law says nobody can be convicted unless they were warned about the possibility of prosecution, either at the time of the incident or in writing shortly afterwards. This gives drivers a fair chance to remember the details of what happened and gather any evidence while the incident is still fresh. 

Common offences that trigger a notice of intended prosecution include:

Not every motoring offence requires a notice of intended prosecution. Offences such as driving without insurance or driving otherwise than in accordance with a licence don’t carry the same requirement. The law treats these differently from offences that rely on the driver’s own recollection of a specific moment on the road.

How Long Does The Police Have To Send A Notice?

In most cases, the police must send the notice of intended prosecution within 14 days of the alleged offence. This can be a verbal warning from a police officer given at the roadside, or a written notice posted to the registered keeper of the vehicle. If an officer tells you at the scene that you may be reported for an offence, that verbal warning satisfies the requirement on its own. 

No separate written notice needs to follow within the 14 days in that case. If the notice is posted so that it should arrive within the 14 day window, that’s usually treated as sufficient, even if it’s actually delivered slightly later. A notice sent by first class post to your last known address is generally treated as served, even if you never actually receive it. Keeping your details up to date with the DVLA matters more than many drivers realise for exactly this reason.

There are exceptions to the 14 day rule. If the vehicle is leased, hired, or owned by a company, the first notice often goes to the leasing company or employer. That organisation must then identify the driver, which means the actual driver may receive their own notice well after the 14 days have passed. The same applies if the police genuinely couldn’t identify the registered keeper in time, for example where DVLA records were incomplete.

What Is The Difference Between An NIP And A Section 172 Notice?

A Notice of Intended Prosecution (NIP) and a Section 172 notice are separate legal requirements, although they are often sent together in the same letter.

The NIP is a formal warning that the police are considering prosecuting the driver for an alleged road traffic offence, such as speeding or dangerous driving. It gives the recipient notice of the alleged offence and the circumstances in which it is said to have occurred.

The Section 172 notice, meanwhile, requires the registered keeper or another person in receipt of the notice to provide information identifying who was driving the vehicle at the relevant time. This requirement arises under Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 and must generally be complied with within the specified timeframe.

The distinction is important because responding to the Section 172 notice does not necessarily mean you have accepted the offence described in the NIP. Equally, the NIP itself does not satisfy the requirement to identify the driver.

Failing to respond to a Section 172 notice without a lawful excuse can result in a separate offence, potentially carrying penalty points and a fine. If you’ve received an NIP and Section 172 notice, it’s important to understand exactly what you’re being asked to do before responding.

What Happens If You Don’t Respond?

You must return the section 172 request within 28 days, confirming who was driving at the time of the alleged offence. Failing to do this is a separate criminal offence in its own right, regardless of whether you were actually guilty of the original driving matter. 

A conviction for failing to provide driver details carries 6 penalty points and a fine of up to £1,000. This applies even if you intend to dispute the underlying offence, so it’s important to respond to the driver information request while you challenge the allegation separately. 

Deliberately giving false information about who was driving is treated far more seriously than simply missing the deadline, and can result in a custodial sentence in serious cases.

Does Receiving A Notice Mean You’ll Definitely Be Prosecuted?

You may be asking, does getting an NIP mean you’re automatically going to court? Not necessarily. Once the police have your response, they typically offer one of a few outcomes depending on the offence and your record.

These can include a fixed penalty notice with points and a fine, an offer to attend a driver awareness course if you’re eligible, or a summons to appear before a court. Receiving the notice simply keeps the option of prosecution open while the police decide how to proceed.

Can You Challenge A Notice of Intended Prosecution?

Yes, in certain circumstances. If the notice wasn’t sent within the required 14 days and none of the recognised exceptions apply, this can affect whether the prosecution is able to proceed at all.

Minor errors on the notice, such as small mistakes in the details, don’t usually make it invalid unless they would genuinely mislead the recipient. If you believe you weren’t the driver, or the notice was served incorrectly, it’s worth speaking to our team before responding, since how you reply can affect your options later.

What Should You Do If You Receive A Notice of Intended Prosecution?

Check the date on the notice against the date of the alleged offence to see whether the 14 day requirement was met. It’s also worth gathering any evidence that might help your case while the details are still fresh, such as dashcam footage, photographs of the location, or the names of any witnesses. This is exactly the kind of evidence the notice period is designed to give you time to collect. 

Acting early, rather than waiting until closer to a court date, puts you in a stronger position. If you’re unsure whether to accept a fixed penalty or contest the matter in court, get legal advice before the deadline rather than after it, since your options can narrow once you’ve responded.

How Our Driving Offence Solicitors Can Help

Receiving a Notice of Intended Prosecution can be the first step in what may become a complex legal process, particularly if you are unsure what the notice means, who is required to respond, or what could happen next. Understanding the difference between the NIP and the Section 172 driver information request is important, but so is knowing how to protect your position from the outset.

Our driving offence solicitors have represented clients across London and England in a wide range of road traffic matters, advising from the initial notice through to court proceedings where necessary. Whether you are facing an allegation of speeding, careless driving, dangerous driving or another motoring offence, we can assess the circumstances of your case and explain your options.

If you’ve received a Notice of Intended Prosecution, don’t leave it until you’re facing a court hearing to seek advice. Get in touch with our team today to arrange an initial consultation and find out how we can help.

Frequently Asked Questions

For most offences covered by the NIP rules, the police must normally serve a written NIP on the registered keeper within 14 days of the alleged offence. There are exceptions, particularly where the vehicle is owned by a hire company or business, or where the police could not identify the registered keeper despite making diligent enquiries.

Receiving a written NIP more than 14 days after the time of the offence does not automatically mean the prosecution is invalid. The circumstances surrounding the delay need to be considered, including who the first notice was sent to and whether the police had the correct contact details for the registered keeper.

If you believe the notice was served outside the required timeframe, it is worth obtaining legal advice before assuming that you have to accept the allegation.

No. An NIP warns you that prosecution may be considered, but it is not itself a charge or conviction. Depending on the offence and the circumstances, the matter could eventually result in a fixed penalty, a speed awareness course or prosecution before the magistrates court.

If the NIP includes a Section 172 requirement, you are legally required to provide information identifying the driver at the time of the alleged offence. This is a separate requirement from the NIP itself. Failing to provide the driver’s identity within the required timeframe can result in a separate offence carrying six penalty points.

If you were not the driver, you should provide the police with the details of the person who was driving, provided you know who that person was. If you genuinely cannot identify the driver, you may need to demonstrate that you have made diligent enquiries to establish who was driving.

You should not nominate someone as the driver simply to avoid facing prosecution yourself. Providing false information can have serious consequences.

Ignoring an NIP and, in particular, failing to respond to a Section 172 request can result in a separate driving offence. Failing to provide driver details can result in six penalty points, a fine and potentially significantly higher insurance costs.

If you are unsure how to respond, it is better to obtain advice than simply allow the deadline to pass.

Potentially. If the allegation relates to speeding and you meet the eligibility criteria, the police may offer a speed awareness course instead of penalty points. Whether this is available depends on factors including the speed alleged, your previous participation in a course and the circumstances of the offence.

A speed awareness course is a form of driver training designed to improve awareness of the risks associated with speeding. It is not available for every speeding offence.

Yes. Speed cameras are one of the common ways that an alleged speeding offence is detected. Where a vehicle is recorded exceeding the speed limit, the registered keeper will typically receive an NIP and Section 172 notice asking them to identify the driver.

The same process can apply where an offence is detected by other forms of evidence, including a police officer.

If you are the registered keeper or have been identified as the person who may have information about the vehicle, you may receive an NIP even if you were not driving.

For example, a hire company or company operating a fleet of vehicles may initially receive the notice before identifying the person who had use of the car at the time of the offence. The eventual driver may then receive a subsequent notice.

In certain circumstances, yes. Potential issues could include whether the NIP was served within the required timeframe, whether the correct person received it or whether there is an issue with the underlying allegation.

However, challenging an NIP does not remove the requirement to respond to a Section 172 driver information request. If you are considering challenging the allegation, you should make sure you comply with any separate legal requirements and applicable time limits.

Once the police receive the completed driver information form, they can decide how to proceed. Depending on the offence, speed alleged and your driving record, you might receive a fixed penalty notice, an offer of a speed awareness course or further correspondence requiring you to attend court.

For more serious allegations, such as dangerous or careless driving, the matter may proceed directly towards prosecution.

Yes. An NIP does not mean that you will definitely have to attend court, but prosecution may follow where the police consider the alleged driving offence sufficiently serious or where a driver chooses to contest the allegation.

If you receive a court summons or other notice requiring you to attend a court hearing, you should take it seriously and consider obtaining specialist legal advice.

Check the date of the alleged offence, the date the notice was issued and the date it was received. Read the Section 172 requirement carefully and make sure you provide the required information within the stated timeframe.

If you believe there is a problem with the notice, you were not the driver, or you are facing a potentially serious driving offence, consider taking legal advice before responding or pleading guilty.

Related Stories

Contact Us

Simple Contact Us